What the Ban on Campaign Finance Is about
There is actually a need to point out that the courts have opted to maintain the ban on corporations extending donations to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is why so many people have been eagerly waiting for this ruling on whether corporates will be allowed to contribute in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
You need to understand that nothing really happened in court. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. This is what has brought about the checking of the role of corporations in matters to do with politics. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
Seek to ensure that you are familiarized with the legal argument in this case. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. They argued that freedom of speech will time and again be compromised by these political donations. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This goes ahead to show that the treatment offered right here tend to be discriminatory. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.